Complex AML cases need more than a checklist. Give them a governed room.
Bring the evidence, policy context, questions, advisers and decisions into one controlled workspace. One AI agent analyses the case material and helps structure the room; a second stays anchored to your firm’s risk policy throughout. Every participant takes an attributable position, while the MLRO retains ownership of the final decision.
When the MLRO is satisfied that the required checks are complete and the positions are resolved, the room can be closed and converted into a timestamped case record with an archival PDF of the supporting evidence, remarks, questions and decisions.
Product concept — governed workspace for a complex AML / EDD case. The dataroom is in development.
A governed workspace for cases that do not fit a standard path.
Most onboarding can follow a defined policy path. Some cases are more complex: layered ownership, cross-border structures, adverse media that needs judgement, or enhanced due diligence with several people contributing to the decision.
The governed dataroom gives that work one controlled home. A case-analysis agent reads the documents uploaded by the MLRO, proposes the review points and suggests who may need to be invited. A separate risk-policy agent remains available throughout the case to test proposed positions against the firm’s guardrails, support readiness review and help prepare the final archival record.
Open. Scope. Review. Close.
Open the case
Create a controlled workspace for the matter, describe the risk context and add the evidence already available.
Structure the review
AI can propose review points from the case context, while the firm decides what must be established and who should contribute.
Record positions and resolve gaps
Participants review the evidence, query the risk policy, discuss unresolved points and record their own position. Specialist input can be added where the firm chooses.
Close with an attributable case log
Once the required points are resolved, the MLRO can sign off and close the case with a timestamped record of the evidence, positions and decision path.
Expertise in the room. Accountability stays with named people.
Independent input stays attributable
Where you engage a specialist, their view is recorded as their own. JUSTE provides the workspace and structure; it does not provide the professional sign-off. You engage and pay the expert directly, and JUSTE takes no commission.
Different views can coexist until they are resolved
Participants can agree, discuss or flag a point for policy review. Each position remains attached to a named person, so the case history shows how disagreement was handled rather than hiding it.
Closure creates the archival record
Once the MLRO has accepted the final position and closes the room, JUSTE packages the case history into a timestamped record and generates a PDF for easy archival, accountability, future reference and audit support.
Two agents, two different responsibilities
The case-analysis agent works from the documents uploaded by the MLRO and helps structure the case and the people needed around it. The risk-policy agent stays anchored to the firm’s codified guardrails, can be consulted during the review, and supports the final readiness assessment. Neither agent owns the decision.
Bring complex cases into one governed record.
The governed dataroom is in development. It is designed to bring complex-case analysis, the right human expertise, policy guardrails, readiness review and final archival into one attributable workflow. Register your interest for early-access updates, or book a demo to see how JUSTE governs the rest of your AML work today.